CVERadar
CRITICAL · CVSS 3.1 9.8CISA KEV · added 2025-01-14Public PoCKnown ransomware useEPSS 94.35% (p100)Threat level 97

CVE-2024-55591: Fortinet FortiOS and FortiProxy Authentication Bypass Vulnerability

Fortinet · FortiOS and FortiProxy · NVD published 2025-01-14 · posted 2025-01-14 · last modified 2026-08-05

What it is

An Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability [CWE-288] affecting FortiOS version 7.0.0 through 7.0.16 and FortiProxy version 7.0.0 through 7.0.19 and 7.2.0 through 7.2.12 allows a remote attacker to gain super-admin privileges via crafted requests to Node.js websocket module.

WeaknessCWE-288
CVSS vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (source: [email protected])
CISA due date2025-01-21 (for US federal agencies under BOD; a good deadline for everyone)
ATT&CK tacticsInitial Access → Persistence → Privilege Escalation → Stealth → Credential Access → Lateral Movement

Exploitation evidence

First exploit evidence seen: 2025-01-14 (earliest date across the sources below).

Exploited in the wild

  • CISA KEV: listed since 2025-01-14. Source

Public exploit code

GitHub proof-of-concept repositories

10 public repositories from 8 accounts, first seen 2025-01-16. Most starred: watchtowrlabs/fortios-auth-bypass-poc-CVE-2024-55591 (76 stars), view repository.

Verify before running: public PoCs can be malicious. Read the code and only run it in an isolated lab. A PoC means exploit code is public, not that this CVE is exploited in the wild.

Sources: CISA KEV · nomi-sec/PoC-in-GitHub.

Defend the Chain

The attack chain for CVE-2024-55591 laid across the MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise tactics. Solid cards come from the MITRE CTID KEV mappings; dashed cards are inferred by CVERadar from the CWE or description. Correct defences are real ATT&CK mitigations for that technique.

Threat level 97/100
Defender level 1 · 0 XP
Chain links broken: 0/4

Pick a red technique card on the board, then choose the defence that stops it.

Defend against T1078 Valid Accounts CTID: primary impact

An attacker can add a local_access_token parameter to a request targeting a specific endpoint on vulnerable Fortinet devices, leading to an authentication bypass. From there, they can obtain super_admin privileges.

How to fix it

CISA required action

Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. (source: CISA KEV)

Fixed versions

  • fortinet fortiproxy: upgrade to 7.0.20 or later (affected from 7.0.0)
  • fortinet fortiproxy: upgrade to 7.2.13 or later (affected from 7.2.0)
  • fortinet fortios: upgrade to 7.0.17 or later (affected from 7.0.0)

Derived from the NVD CPE configuration (versionEndExcluding / versionEndIncluding). Always confirm with the vendor advisory.

Vendor advisories and patches

MITRE ATT&CK mitigations for this chain

  • M1027 Password Policies (for T1078, T1555, T1021) : Applications and appliances that utilize default username and password should be changed immediately after the installation, and before deployment to a production environment. When possible, applications that use SSH keys should be updated periodically and properly secured. Policies should minimize (if not eliminate)
  • M1018 User Account Management (for T1078, T1021) : Regularly audit user accounts for activity and deactivate or remove any that are no longer needed.
  • M1026 Privileged Account Management (for T1078, T1555) : Audit domain and local accounts as well as their permission levels routinely to look for situations that could allow an adversary to gain wide access by obtaining credentials of a privileged account. These audits should also include if default accounts have been enabled, or if new local accounts are created that have
  • M1032 Multi-factor Authentication (for T1078, T1021) : Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) across all account types, including default, local, domain, and cloud accounts, to prevent unauthorized access, even if credentials are compromised. MFA provides a critical layer of security by requiring multiple forms of verification beyond just a password. This measure sign
  • M1013 Application Developer Guidance (for T1078) : Ensure that applications do not store sensitive data or credentials insecurely. (e.g. plaintext credentials in code, published credentials in repositories, or credentials in public cloud storage).
  • M1017 User Training (for T1078) : Applications may send push notifications to verify a login as a form of multi-factor authentication (MFA). Train users to only accept valid push notifications and to report suspicious push notifications.
  • M1015 Active Directory Configuration (for T1078) : Disable legacy authentication, which does not support MFA, and require the use of modern authentication protocols instead.
  • M1036 Account Use Policies (for T1078) : Use conditional access policies to block logins from non-compliant devices or from outside defined organization IP ranges.
  • M1051 Update Software (for T1068, T1555) : Update software regularly by employing patch management for internal enterprise endpoints and servers.
  • M1050 Exploit Protection (for T1068) : Security applications that look for behavior used during exploitation such as Windows Defender Exploit Guard (WDEG) and the Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit (EMET) can be used to mitigate some exploitation behavior. Control flow integrity checking is another way to potentially identify and stop a software exploi

Detection Generic guidance

  • Initial Access: Alert on unusual requests to the affected service (odd paths, oversized payloads, exploit strings) in WAF, reverse-proxy and application logs.
  • Persistence: Look for new files in web roots, new scheduled tasks/services, and new accounts created after the exposure window.
  • Privilege Escalation: Alert on processes gaining SYSTEM/root unexpectedly, and on exploitation crashes of privileged services.
  • Credential Access: Monitor for credential dumping, unusual LSASS access and sudden authentication from new sources.
  • Lateral Movement: Watch for the compromised host authenticating to other internal systems it does not normally talk to.

Response checklist Generic guidance

  1. Inventory: find every instance of the affected product and version (include internet-facing and forgotten ones).
  2. Patch or mitigate per the vendor advisory; if you cannot patch, remove internet exposure or apply the vendor workaround.
  3. Assume compromise if the system was exposed before patching: hunt for the indicators in the advisory and review logs back to the disclosure date.
  4. Rotate credentials and secrets stored on or used by the affected system if compromise cannot be ruled out.

Sources